Authority to pay retroactively; school board
Mr. Stanley E. Marable
Attorney for the Lake County School Board
Post Office Drawer 1357
Leesburg, Florida 32748
RE: SCHOOLS BOARDS--Retroactive salary payment to teacher unauthorized
Dear Mr. Marable:
This is in response to your request for an opinion on the following question:
Is the Lake County District School Board legally authorized to pay a vocational teacher retroactively for eight years of prior vocational work related experience?
According to your letter, the individual in question was first employed as a vocational classroom teacher by the Lake County District School Board in April 1973. At that time, the school board did not consider prior work experience with other employers in determining an employee's salary; effective July 1, 1973, however, the school board implemented a new policy which permitted past work experience to be credited for salary purposes for vocational or technical teachers. This policy, which is still in effect, imposes the responsibility for establishing proof of past work experience on the teacher in order to receive credit for salary purposes. The policy to allow credit for past experience has been, according to your letter, published in the school board's policy book and similar language has been contained in all collective bargaining agreements between the school board and the Lake County Education Association, the bargaining representative for classroom teachers, see, e.g., Art. XVI, ss. 3 and 4 of the current collective bargaining agreement. Moreover, you state that the personnel office of the school district attempts to inform all employees of this policy.
You state that the teacher in question in the instant inquiry has progressed along the yearly experience increments of the salary schedule and at the beginning of the 1981-1982 school year had eight years experience. In the fall of 1981, she apparently first realized that the school board would allow for salary purposes credit for past vocational work related experience and was able to establish eight years of prior experience which qualified for credit in addition to the eight years of experience she had accrued as a teacher within the Lake County School District. Accordingly, she was advanced eight levels on the salary schedule, effective the beginning of the 1981-1982 school year, and is now credited with sixteen years of experience. The teacher has stated that she did not learn until this school year that she was entitled to credit for past work related experience and has therefore requested that the eight years verified in the fall of 1981 be credited retroactively to the beginning of the 1973-1974 school year and that her past salary be adjusted accordingly. This would result in the school board paying the teacher the difference between her total salary for the past eight years and what she would have received had she established in 1973 her eight years prior experience. Accordingly, you inquire as to whether the district school board is legally authorized to make such a retroactive payment.
Section 230.23(5)(c), F.S., authorizes the district school board to adopt salary schedules and to fix and authorize the compensation of its school employees on the basis of such schedules. Cf. ss. 236.02(3)(b) and (4), F.S., requiring each school district which participates in the state appropriations for the Florida Education Finance Program to pay all personnel in accordance with payroll period schedules adopted by the school board and included in the official salary schedule and to expend funds for salaries in accordance with the salary schedule(s) adopted by the board in accordance with the provisions of law and the regulations of the State Board of Education. In addition, the school board is required to provide written contracts with all regular members of the instructional staff. All such contracts, which are to be in accordance with the salary schedules adopted by the school board, "shall be in writing for definite amounts and for definite terms of service, and shall specify the number of monthly payments to be made," s. 230.23(5)(d), F.S. The subsection further provides that the school board "is prohibited from paying any salary to any member of the instructional staff, except when this provision has been observed."
Under the policy adopted by the school board, it is the responsibility of the teacher, not the board, to establish proof of his or her past work experience in order to receive credit for salary purposes; if a teacher fails to establish verification of past experience by the time the employee has received his or her third paycheck from the school board, he or she will not be credited with the prior experience during that fiscal year. See Art. XVI, s. 4 of the collective bargaining agreement which is in accord with this policy and which states:
"All previous years of experience that have been filed up to the time of making the third payroll affecting that teacher will be calculated in the current annual salary as provided in the salary schedule. Experience verified after preparation of the third payroll shall not be calculated in the salary of the teacher until the next fiscal year of employment."
In the instant inquiry, the teacher failed to comply with the requirements of the school board policy until the fall of 1981; she had, however, been compensated for her services as a teacher, presumably having received, in accordance with the aforementioned statutes and the salary schedule adopted by the school board, a definite salary in monthly payments for a definite term of service. It was not until the fall of 1981 that the teacher, having provided the school board with verification of her past work experience, became entitled under the school board's policy and the terms of the collective bargaining agreement to receive credit for her past experience. She was at the time advanced eight levels on the salary schedule.
Section 215.425, F.S., provides in pertinent part that "[n]o extra compensation shall be made to any officer, agent, employee, or contractor after the service shall have been rendered or the contract made . . .." Section 215.425 was formerly Art. XVI, s. 11, State Const. 1885, as amended, and was converted to statutory law by Art. XII, s. 10, State Const. 1968. The purpose of this provision prohibiting compensation for work already performed is to carry out a basic and fundamental principle that public funds may be used only for a public purpose and it is contrary to this policy to use public funds to give extra compensation for work which has already been performed for an agreed upon wage. See AGO 081-98 wherein this office stated that a municipality could not expend public funds to reimburse municipal employees who have expended monies to purchase additional past service credit which the city elected not to provide when it had the opportunity to do so, in order to obtain full retirement benefits because such action would constitute extra compensation or a lump sum allowance not provided for by law or contract granted after the rendition of services which is prohibited by s. 215.425. Thus retroactive extra compensation, lump sum allowances or other forms of compensation not provided for by law or contract and not earned in regular monthly installments are prohibited by s. 215.425. Chapter 80-114, Laws of Florida, amended s. 215.425 to specify a limited exception to that section's general prohibition by providing that a district school board when adopting salary schedules for a fiscal year "may apply the schedule for payment of all services rendered subsequent to July 1 of that fiscal year." The case under consideration, however, does not fall within the terms or scope of this limited exception, and no other exception may be read into the statute. See Williams v. American Surety Company of New York, 99 So.2d 877 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1958) (where statute sets forth exceptions, no others may be implied to be intended); Dobbs v. Sea Isle Hotel, 56 So.2d 341 (Fla. 1952).
In the instant inquiry, the teacher seeks to recover the difference between what she received during the years 1973-1981 and what she would have been entitled to had she provided proof of her past work experience in compliance with school board policy. Such a payment would be, in my opinion, prohibited by the terms of s. 215.425. The teacher performed her services and was compensated for those services during those years. Pursuant to school board policy, she was not entitled to credit for prior work experience until she provided verification of such experience. Payment now would grant the teacher extra compensation for work which had already been performed for an agreed upon wage. See AGO 075-311 in which this office stated that retroactive application for the unclaimed compensation in question was available for services performed by members of the State Board of Cosmetology during the current fiscal year if funds for that purpose have been budgeted and remain unspent at the time a board member's application has been processed; however, any application for retroactive compensation for services rendered by board members prior to the instant fiscal year must be by claims bill pursuant to s. 215.425, F.S. Compare AGO 075-279 wherein this office opined that a teacher's salary contract providing for a salary increase which is entered into through collective bargaining subsequent to the beginning of the salary year does not represent a claim for extra compensation prohibited by s. 215.425 as the teacher did not perform his teaching services for an agreed upon salary under a binding contract applicable to the current year but rather performed those services in accordance with the previous year's salary schedule pending negotiation of contracts for the new year pursuant to the collective bargaining negotiations and with the understanding that the new contracts would incorporate the new salary schedule to which they would be entitled for the entire year. Thus this office was of the opinion that a subsequent salary adjustment made after the collectively bargained agreement was approved and ratified and which was made pursuant to and in performance of said agreement did not appear to represent "extra compensation" prohibited by s. 215.425. In the instant inquiry, however, the teacher was compensated for her services at an agreed upon wage pursuant to an existing contract during those years.
Accordingly, I am of the opinion, until and unless judicially or legislatively determined to the contrary, that the retroactive payment to a vocational teacher for eight years of prior vocational work related experience constitutes "extra compensation" prohibited by s. 215.425, F.S., and thus the district school board is unauthorized to make such a retroactive salary payment to the teacher.
Assistant Attorney General
The ultimate penalty for non-compliance with Title IX regulations is the withdrawal of federal funds, including monies earmarked for student loans.What did the final rule add to Title IX? ›
The Final Rule adds: - A school may not require as a condition of enrollment or continuing enrollment, or employment or continuing employment, or enjoyment of any other right, waiver of the right to a formal investigation and adjudication of formal complaints of sexual harassment.How is a school deliberately indifferent? ›
The concept of deliberate indifference can determine a school's or school district's level of liability in Title IX cases. If a school has actual knowledge of sexual harassment allegations but does not take appropriate action based on the known circumstances, that school is showing deliberate indifference.What is the Pennsylvania Public School Act? ›
Pennsylvania Public School Code of 1949 Act of Mar. 10, 1949, 24 P.S. An Act Relating to the public school system, including provisions applicable as well to private and parochial schools; amending, revising, consolidating and changing the laws relating thereto.What is the average settlement for Title IX? ›
That wasn't the case 10 years ago.” Settling complaints from alleged victims in court cost colleges and universities an average of $350,000 in the years following the Obama guidance, and some settlements reached $1 million, UE reported in an analysis of Title IX claims from 2011 to 2015 at 1,600 institutions.What are the consequences of non compliance with the code of conduct? ›
Individuals can face criminal charges, financial penalties, and job loss. Compliance with regulations and ethical standards is critical to protect the safety of employees, consumers, and the public and maintain the trust of our customers and stakeholders.How do you beat Title IX case? ›
- Obtain Supportive Witness Testimony. ...
- Undermine Legitimacy of Complainant. ...
- Secure Conflicting Evidence on Social Media. ...
- Negotiate with the School or Complainant. ...
- Contact Binnall Law Group, PLLC for Title IX Defense Guidance.
In a Title IX case, the burden of proof and of gathering evidence does not fall on either the complainant or the accused, but instead, it falls on the school. That is not to say that the school must side with one party, or that the parties cannot gather evidence and make arguments on their own behalf.What are the 3 ways in which Title IX is enforced? ›
OCR enforces Title IX by investigating complaints, conducting compliance reviews, and providing technical assistance. An institution found to violate Title IX (or any of the regulations enforced by OCR) has the opportunity to remedy the violation voluntarily.What is retaliation under Title IX? ›
Retaliation includes intimidation, verbal or physical threats, coercion, or discrimination. When evidence of retaliatory behavior exists, appropriate disciplinary action will be taken. Evidence of retaliation may exist even when there is a finding of “not responsible” on the underlying formal complaint.
Students often feel impostor syndrome, or the worry that they don't belong at school.What are the characteristics of a bad school? ›
- No clear sense of purpose. ...
- Hostile relations among staff, students, and parents. ...
- An emphasis on rules over people or mission. ...
- An absence of honest dialogue. ...
- More self-preservation than collaboration. ...
- Active back channels over formal lines of communication.
Course Description. Act 13 requires a deep understanding of the supervision and evaluative process. School leaders need to be positioned to engage in supervision and evaluation with knowledge, skills, and confidence whether new to the leadership role or experienced.What is Act 88 in Pennsylvania education? ›
Act 88 does this by requiring teachers to work at least 180 classroom days. These are days in which students are present, excluding days for in-service training or parent-teacher conferences between the start of classes at the beginning of a school year and June 30 of the following calendar year.What is Act 93 in PA? ›
Under Act 93, the school board after good faith Meet and Discuss can adopt the administrator compensation plan without the concurrence of the administrators. On the other hand, act 195 does not require either side to agree to a particular contract.How much money should I ask for in a settlement? ›
To get a general idea of settlement, add up the costs in medical bills, damages, and lost wages, and multiply the sum by three. This may be around the amount in the settlement you can receive after a car accident. Compensation for pain and suffering is only given to those who are injured in a car accident.What is a good settlement figure? ›
How Much Should I Expect from a Settlement? A good settlement offer should not only be able to cover your hospital bills and legal fees, but it should also be equivalent to close to a years' worth of your current wages, especially in cases where your injuries may be permanent or cause some kind of disability.What is a good settlement agreement amount? ›
The rough 'rule of thumb' that is generally used to determine the value of a settlement agreement (in respect of compensation for termination of employment) is two to three months' gross salary.What is violating code of conduct? ›
A code-of-conduct violation can occur when an employee doesn't follow company policies, or when a member of a profession or an industry doesn't adhere to written ethical guidelines.What is violation of our code of conduct? ›
These may include plagiarism, cheating, forgery, sabotage, falsification and bribery. Some schools will also consider the mere attempt to commit such acts as academic dishonesty.
What is the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of evidence? “Beyond a reasonable doubt” is the standard of proof that applies in a criminal trial. It is a very high standard of proof that is significantly greater than the preponderance of the evidence standard and is NOT used in BYU Title IX investigations.What are the rights of accused people in Title IX? ›
What are your rights under Title IX? Being accused of sexual misconduct can immediately put you on the defense but remember that you have rights. You have the right to be prompt notification of an accusation. You have the right to an impartial investigation.How do you prove burden of proof? ›
Depending on the jurisdiction and type of action, the legal standard to satisfy the burden of proof in U.S. litigation may include, but is not limited to: beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal law. clear and convincing evidence in fraud in will disputes. preponderance of the evidence in most civil cases.What is burden of proof justification? ›
Holder of the burden
When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.
The burden of proof is a legal standard that requires parties to provide evidence to demonstrate that a claim is valid. Three levels of the burden of proof, "beyond a reasonable doubt," a "preponderance of the evidence," and "clear and convincing" determine the level of evidence required for a claim.What is not protected by Title IX? ›
Further, Title IX does not apply to father-son or mother-daughter activities at an educational institution –- but if such activities are provided for students of one sex, reasonably comparable opportunities much be provided for members of the other sex.What is the 3 prong test for Title IX? ›
Evaluation of Component I – whether the school is providing adequate sports participation opportunities to the girls enrolled at the institution – first requires application of the “three-prong test.” An institution can demonstrate compliance by showing any one of three alternative criteria: 1) substantial ...What are the examples of retaliation under Title IX? ›
Retaliation. Retaliatory acts, which may include giving students failing grades, preventing students from participating in school activities, and threatening expulsion against any individual who exercises his or her rights under Title IX, are considered to be discrimination and are unlawful.What is retaliatory behavior? ›
Retaliatory actions are broadly defined to harassing behavior, significant changes to job duties or working conditions, and even threats to take personnel actions.What is a hostile environment under Title IX? ›
Hostile Environment is defined as the following by Title IX:
An intimidating or offensive environment that causes a person to be fearful. A setting that denies, limits, or interferes with a person's ability to participate in or benefit from a program, activity, or job.
- Protected activity.
- Adverse action.
- Causal connection.
School anxiety is a condition that can affect students of all ages. It manifests as an excessive fear of school and the activities associated with it, such as making friends, speaking in public, or taking tests.What is school avoidance disorder? ›
What is school refusal? School refusal is a term used to describe the signs of anxiety a school-aged child has and his or her refusal to go to school. It is also called school avoidance or school phobia. It can be seen in different types of situations, including: Young children going to school for the first time.Is school refusal a mental illness? ›
School refusal is considered a symptom and may be associated with diagnoses such as social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, specific phobias, major depression, oppositional defiant disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and adjustment disorder, among others.What is a toxic school? ›
Toxic school culture is one in which there is a high level of stress and tension, and employees are not empowered to make decisions that are best for them and the school community as a whole.How do you know if your school is toxic? ›
- No clear sense of purpose.
- Hostile relations among staff, students, and parents.
- Emphasis on rules over people or mission.
- An absence of honest dialogue.
- More self-preservation than collaboration.
- Active back channels over formal lines of communication.
Many things make a bad teacher, including lack of organization and classroom management, poor people skills, and not challenging students. Here are some details on these items and others that make a bad teacher: Lack of organization and classroom management.What is Act 52 in PA? ›
Act 52 of 2007 requires certain healthcare facilities in Pennsylvania to report healthcare-associated infections to the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Pennsylvania Healthcare Cost Containment Council and the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National ...What is Act 50 in PA? ›
SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES DEPLOYMENT ACT - ENACTMENT.What is Act 55 in PA? ›
Under Pennsylvania law, the age of majority for purposes of special education is 21 years. In the event a student with a disability is unable to provide approval or consent to stay an additional year, the student's parent or guardian should follow the process of securing educational decision-making rights.
Under Act 44, Pennsylvania made an application to the Federal Highway Administration for permission to place tolls (I-80). The Commission was to install and manage toll collection on I-80. The tolls would have funded I-80's reconstruction and funded Commission payments to PennDOT.What is PA Act 70? ›
Act 70 of 2010 requires an employee or administrator of a facility who has reasonable cause to suspect that a recipient is a victim of abuse, neglect, exploitation or abandonment to make an immediate report.What is Act 43 in PA? ›
Act 43: What Water & Sewer Systems Need to Know about the Impact on Multi-Family Billings. December 30, 2022 / An amendment to the Pennsylvania Municipality Authorities Act allows the owner of a multi-family dwelling to request a billing adjustment every five years if the amount billed exceeds the usage by 30% or more.What is Act 20 in Pennsylvania? ›
2021 Pennsylvania Consolidated & Unconsolidated Statutes. Act 20 - FAMILY CAREGIVER SUPPORT ACT - PRIMARY CAREGIVER SUPPORT PROGRAM, REIMBURSEMENTS AND ENTITLEMENT NOT CREATED AND FOR ENFORCEMENT.What is Act 49 in PA? ›
All newly elected constables or appointed deputy constables are required, under Act 49-2009 §7142(a) to attend and successfully complete Basic Training in order to perform judicial duties and be paid.What is Act 33 in PA? ›
ACT 33 – PENNSYLVANIA CHILD ABUSE CLEARANCE INFORMATION. In order to comply with Pennsylvania legislation (ACT 153), your position requires that you secure a new Act 33 Pennsylvania Child Abuse History Clearance every 60 months. You are required to provide original documentation of this clearance by the.What is a consequence of Title IX? ›
A recent article in the New York Times found that there are lasting benefits for women from Title IX: participation in sports increased education as well as employment opportunities for girls. Furthermore, the athletic participation by girls and women spurred by Title IX was associated with lower obesity rates.What is one of the possible consequences of noncompliance with regulatory requirements? ›
Penalties and Fines
Penalties on regulatory non compliance come in multiple forms: financial fines, limitations on activities, additional barriers to approval and even prison.
Title IX Violations
When an educational institution fails to uphold its Title IX responsibilities, it can lose federal funds for violating the law. OCR can also require corrective action and the U.S. Supreme Court paved the way in 1992 for victims to sue institutions for financial restitution and attorney fees.
Errors in billing and coding can have serious consequences, including allegations of fraud, significant legal costs, loss of reputation, and even criminal penalties.
Harassment of a sexual nature which interferes with an individual's right to an education and participation in a program or activity.What are the examples of Title IX violations? ›
Examples of the types of discrimination that are covered under Title IX include sexual harassment; the failure to provide equal athletic opportunity; sex-based discrimination in a school's science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) courses and programs; and discrimination based on pregnancy.What happens if you are not in compliance? ›
Prison. Prison sentences can be issued for individuals found to be in non-compliance with certain laws. These prison sentences will depend on the relevant jurisdiction of the offense and can range from several months to years in prison.What first action should be taken when dealing with a non compliant patient? ›
- Be understanding. Put yourself in the patient's shoes and make every effort to be empathetic, thus recognizing the challenges they may experience when trying to understand your requests. ...
- Educate. ...
- Document everything. ...
- Set boundaries and enforce them. ...
- Avoid ultimatums.
- Conflicts of Interest.
- Embezzlement or Fraud.
- Ethical Standards Violations.
- Medical Billing Irregularities. Billing for services not rendered or items not provided. ...
- Patient Privacy Rights / Other Patient Rights.
- Policy Violations.
The Supreme Court decided its first Title IX school sexual harassment case in 1992. That case, Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools, involved sexual harassment of a high school student by a teacher. The Court recognized that private individuals bringing Title IX suits could sue schools for monetary damages.Can violation of Title IX result in lose of federal funding to the institution? ›
Anonymity is maintained and institutions are prohibited from retailing against any complainant. Is there a penalty for Title IX non-compliance? Yes! Schools can lose federal funds for violating the law.Which of the following types of schools are not required to comply with Title IX? ›
Public elementary and secondary schools (admissions exempt)
Title IX's prohibition on discrimination in admissions applies only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, and graduate higher education, and to public institutions of undergraduate higher education.
Ethics violations such as discrimination, safety violations, poor working conditions and releasing proprietary information are other examples.What is violation of code of conduct and ethics? ›
Breaking the code of ethics can result in termination or dismissal from the organization. A code of ethics is important because it clearly lays out the rules for behavior and provides the groundwork for a preemptive warning.
A code-of-conduct violation can occur when an employee doesn't follow company policies, or when a member of a profession or an industry doesn't adhere to written ethical guidelines.